Direct Oral Anticoagulants Treatment Research Articles

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Pulmonary Embolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease. For most patients, the standard of treatment has long consisted on low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists, but a number of clinical trials and, subsequently, post-marketing studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with or without lead-in heparin therapy are effective alternatives with fewer adverse effects. This evidence has led to important changes in the guidelines on the treatment of VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE), with the DOACs being now recommended as the first therapeutic choice. Additional research has contributed to identifying low-risk PE patients who can benefit from outpatient management or from early discharge from the emergency department with DOAC treatment. There is evidence to support the use of DOACs in intermediate-risk PE patients as well as in high-risk patients receiving thrombolytic treatment. The use of DOACs has also been proven to be safe and effective in special populations of PE patients, such as patients with renal impairment, liver impairment, and cancer.

Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study

AbstractAlthough effective and safe, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is still associated with thrombotic complications. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may improve treatment efficacy is an open issue. We carried out the observational, prospective, multicenter Measure and See (MAS) study. Blood was collected 15 to 30 days after starting DOAC treatment in patients with AF who were followed-up for 1 year. Plasma samples were centralized for DOAC level measurement. Patients’ DOAC levels were converted into drug/dosage standardized values to allow a pooled analysis in a time-dependent, competitive-risk model. The measured values were transformed into standardized values (representing the distance of each value from the overall mean) by subtracting the DOAC-specific mean value from the original values and dividing by the standard deviation. Trough and peak DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 and 1303 patients, respectively. In total, 21 thrombotic complications were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (incidence of 1.31% of patients per year). Of 21 thrombotic events, 17 occurred in patients whose standardized activity levels were below the mean of each DOAC (0); the incidence was the highest (4.82% of patients per year) in patients whose standardized values were in the lowest class (−1.00 or less). Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF allowed us to identify most of the patients who, having low baseline DOAC levels, subsequently developed thrombotic complications. Further studies are warranted to assess whether thrombotic complications may be reduced by measuring baseline DOAC levels and modifying treatment when indicated. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579.

Effect of direct oral anticoagulants on bleeding during and after cataract surgery

PurposeTo assess the risk for intraoperative and postoperative ocular bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulant treatment in patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery.MethodsConsecutive patients had phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation while taking uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban). Gender and age-matched patients without antithrombotic therapy were used as the control group. Patients were examined one week postoperatively. Intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications were assessed.ResultsForty patients (56 eyes) on direct oral anticoagulants and 120 patients (172 eyes) without anticoagulation, at a mean age of 77 years, had phacoemulsification. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. One eye (1.8%) in the treatment group and 3 eyes (1.7%) in the control group had hyphema (p = 0.72). No patient had thromboembolic event during or after surgery.ConclusionsCataract surgery was safely performed while continuing direct oral anticoagulation.

Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Potential Causes, Clinical Characteristics, and Short-Term Outcomes.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the first-line treatment for primary and secondary acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but a significant percentage of patients develop AIS despite being treated with DOAC. As the number of DOAC-treated patients is growing, so is the number of patients with AIS on DOAC. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of AIS with prestroke DOAC treatment among patients hospitalised in the University Hospital in Kraków, to analyse the clinical characteristics of AIS occurring in patients on DOAC, and to identify potential causes of treatment ineffectiveness in this group. In the study, we included all patients hospitalised in the Department of Neurology of the University Hospital in Kraków within one year (July 2022 to June 2023) with the diagnosis of AIS. The group was divided into two subgroups of patients with and without prestroke DOAC treatment. Based on medical files, we retrospectively analysed the profile of cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity (assessed with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS), use of causative stroke treatment and short-term outcomes (defined as NIHSS score, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and secondary intracerebral haemorrhage among patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, MT). Within the DOAC-treated subgroup, we looked for potential causes of AIS occurring despite DOAC treatment (valvular AF, poor adherence to treatment, underdosing, other prothrombotic conditions, aetiology of stroke other than thromboembolic, and drug-drug interactions). In the study, we included 768 AIS patients. 109 (14.2%) had a history of prestroke DOAC treatment. A potential cause of DOAC treatment failure was identified in the majority of them (n = 63, 57.8%). Patients with prestroke DOAC treatment had worse functional condition before stroke and higher stroke severity on admission but similar short-term outcomes and similar short-term effects of treatment with MT. DOAC (+) and DOAC (-) patients had different profiles of cardiovascular risk factors and different factors associated with short-term outcome. Conclusions and Clinical Implications. A potential cause of AIS occurring in DOAC-treated patients can be identified in most cases and in many of them prevented.

Intracerebral haemorrhage in patients taking different types of oral anticoagulants: a pooled individual patient data analysis from two national stroke registries

BackgroundWe investigated outcomes in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) according to prior anticoagulation treatment with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or no anticoagulation.MethodsThis is an individual patient...

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention of Ischaemic Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Introduction Existing randomised controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in atrial fibrillation (AF) were of relatively small sample size, or included patients who could receive oral anticoagulant treatment after device implantation. We compared the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed AF who received percutaneous LAAO or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) treatment, in a large population from a global federated health network (TriNetX). Methods Patients with AF treated with percutaneous LAAO were matched with those treated with DOAC between 1st December 2010 and 1st October 2018. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) at 5 years. Results We included 200 patients with AF, who received either LAAO or DOAC. The risk of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke and ICH at 5 years was not significantly different between the two groups (Risk Ratio [RR] for all-cause mortality: 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97- 2.38, RR for ischaemic stroke: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.51- 2.36, and RR for ICH: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.44- 2.30). Conclusion Patients newly diagnosed with AF, eligible for DOAC, showed similar 5-year risk of death, ischemic stroke, and ICH when comparing those who underwent percutaneous LAAO to those receiving DOAC. Future randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings and advise changes in guidelines.

Changing or Retaining Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Ischemic Stroke Despite Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment.

The optimal antithrombotic strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation who experience ischemic stroke (IS) despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy remain inconclusive. This study compared outcomes for patients with DOAC treatment failure who changed or retained their prestroke DOAC. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2012 to 2020. Patients with atrial fibrillation who experienced IS during DOAC therapy were assigned to either (1) the DOAC-change group: changing prestroke DOAC or (2) the DOAC-retain group: retaining prestroke DOAC. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent IS and transient ischemic attack. The secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, systemic thromboembolism, and all-cause death. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance the baseline characteristics between the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups. The Cox proportional hazards model compared the risk of outcomes between the 2 groups. In total, 1979 patients were enrolled (609 DOAC-change patients and 1370 DOAC-retain patients). The incidence rates of recurrent IS or transient ischemic attack were 7.20 and 6.56 per 100 person-years in the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.30]). A nonsignificantly higher incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the DOAC-change group compared with the DOAC-retain group (0.75 versus 0.53 per 100-person-years; HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.78-2.83]). The systemic thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death rates were comparable between the DOAC-change and DOAC-retain groups. Changing prestroke DOAC does not reduce the risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia in patients with atrial fibrillation who develop IS during DOAC therapy. However, future studies should continue to observe the potential trends of increased intracranial hemorrhage risk.

Assessment of Adherence and Self-Efficacy in a Sample of Iraqi Patients Receiving Warfarin or Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Background: While warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used to manage thromboembolic events, they possess several features that impact adherence. Objective: To assess medication adherence and self-efficacy in patients receiving warfarin or DOAC treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed at Ibn Al-Bitar Hospital in Baghdad from December 2022 to May 2023 on patients receiving either warfarin or DOACs. The Arabic version of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) questionnaire and the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SES6C) questionnaire were used to assess adherence and self-efficacy. Results: 181 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 56.9% received warfarin and 43.1% received DOACs. The mean ARMS score was 13.71, and 81.77% of the patients were adherent to anticoagulant therapy. There was a significant difference in adherence between the warfarin and DOAC groups. The mean SES6C score for the participants was 50.01. Patients in the DOAC group had significantly higher self-efficacy compared to those in the warfarin group. The adherence score correlated significantly with patients’ gender, education level, hospitalization and duration of anticoagulant use, while the SES6C score did not correlate with any of the independent variables. There was a significant negative correlation between self-efficacy scores and medication adherence scores. Conclusions: Patients receiving DOACs showed a higher self-efficacy to manage chronic diseases and lower medication adherence as compared to warfarin. Higher self-efficacy was associated with higher adherence to treatment.

International Normalized Ratio Predicts Recurrence and Bleeding in Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism Who Undergo Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) is related to both antithrombotic effect and risk of bleeding. Its role in the prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding for patients with acute VTE who undergo direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) treatment is unclear, despite previous studies revealed some association between them. The predictive efficiency of INR for VTE recurrence and bleeding were analyzed in a retrospective cohort with VTE patients who underwent DOACs treatment. Then its predictive efficiency for VTE recurrence and bleeding were validated in a prospective cohort with the acquired cutoffs range, and compared with anti-Xa level, DASH and VTE-BLEED scores. In the retrospective cohort (n = 1083), the sensitivity and specificity of INR for the prediction of VTE recurrence were 79.4% and 92.8%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.881 (0.803-0.960)(P = .025). The cutoff value of INR was 0.9. The sensitivity and specificity of INR for the prediction of bleeding were 85.7% and 77.9%, respectively. The AUC was 0.876 (0.786-0.967)(P < .001). The cutoff value of INR was 2.1. In the prospective cohort (n = 202), the calibration showed that there were 4 (50%) patients with VTE recurrence, 156 (97.5%) patients with non-recurrence and bleeding (non-R&B), and 20 (58.8%) patients with bleeding in the low (INR < 0.9)(n = 8), intermediate (0.9 ≤ INR ≤ 2.1)(n = 160), and high (INR > 2.1)(n = 34) groups, respectively. The baseline PT/INR value at the initiation of DOACs treatment is an independent predictor for VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients with acute VTE who undergo DOACs treatment.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Special Patient Populations.

Anticoagulants are a cornerstone of treatment in atrial fibrillation. Nowadays, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are extensively used for this condition in developed countries. However, DOAC treatment may be inappropriate in certain patient populations, such as: patients with chronic kidney disease in whom DOAC concentrations may be dangerously elevated; frail elderly patients with an increased risk of falls; patients with significant drug-drug interactions (DDI) affecting either DOAC concentration or effect; patients at the extremes of body mass in whom an "abnormal" volume of distribution may result in inappropriate drug concentrations; patients with recurrent stroke reflecting an unusually high thromboembolic tendency; and, lastly, patients who experience major hemorrhage on an anticoagulant and in whom continued anticoagulation is deemed necessary. Herein we provide a fictional case-based approach to review the recommendations for the use of DOACs in these special patient populations.

Interprofessional collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists to promote the safe and responsible use of direct oral anticoagulants.

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are important assets in the prevention and treatment of thrombo-embolic disease due to the unrivalled combination of ease of use, safety and effectiveness compared to other antithrombotic treatments. However, many drug related problems appear while prescribing and/or dispensing DOAC. Different indications exist and different dosages are available. Moreover, dosage adjustments need to be done in several cases and DOAC are often involved in drug-drug interactions. &#x0D; Policy Context And Objective: In 2017, the Royal Association of Pharmacists in Antwerpen (KAVA) and Domus Medica have developed a quality improving program (QIP) in the context of Medical-Pharmaceutical Concertation (MPC). MPC is an initiative from the National Institute for Health &amp; Disability Insurance (NIHDI) in Belgium to promote the rational prescribing and dispensing of medication and the safe use of medication in general. The NIHDI provides financial incentives to general practitioners (GP) and community pharmacists (CP) to organize local MPC-projects, based on a QIP. A local MPC-project starts with a ‘kick-off meeting’, to make agreements of the rational use of medication. Most of the time, different cases are discussed in small interprofessional groups. After this meeting, the agreements are subsequently implemented into practice and can be evaluated with quality indicators.&#x0D; This specific QIP focusses on three challenges: (1) prescribing and dispensing of the correct dose, in function of all patients characteristics, (2) correctly dealing with possible drug-drug interactions, and (3) peri-operative management and switch between DOAC and other anticoagulants. Additionally, this QIP focusses on recent changes in DOAC therapy.&#x0D; Target Population: MPC targets the general practitioner and community pharmacist with mutual patients on DOAC-therapy.&#x0D; Highlights: The Royal Association of Pharmacists in Antwerpen (KAVA) and the GP organization Domus Medica strongly believe in this initiative. Currently 20 local MPC-projects based on this QIP have been organized in which 173 CP and 236 GP participated.&#x0D; Topics that were mostly involved in the local MPC-project were&#x0D; &#x0D; The importance of the correct dosage regimen (discussed in 95% of the projects, n = 19);&#x0D; Handling drug-drug interactions (80% - n = 16);&#x0D; Perioperative management and switch between vitamin K antagonists and DOAC (60% - n = 12).&#x0D; &#x0D; Different conclusions were made during these MPC-projects. Most decisions handled about the communication between het pharmacist and general practitioner, the need of shared data and the role of the pharmacist in checking dosage regimens and drug-drug interactions.&#x0D; All participants stated that DOAC treatment is still challenging because of the different dosage regimens and possible drug-drug interactions, therefore good collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners is crucial.&#x0D; Conclusion: MPC is an initiative from the NIHDI in Belgium to promote the rational prescribing and dispensing of medication and the safe use of medication in general. KAVA and Domus Medica have developed a quality improving program, specifically targeted on DOAC. Currently, 20 local MPC-projects have been organized. Further research is necessary to analyze the impact of the MPC-project.

Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Screening, and Prognosis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrythmia and one of the strongest risk factors and causal mechanisms of ischemic stroke (IS). Acute IS due to AF tends to be more severe than with other etiology of IS and patients with treated AF have reported to experience worse outcomes after endovascular treatment compared with patients without AF. As cardioembolism accounts for more than a fifth of ISs and the risk of future stroke can be mitigated with effective anticoagulation, which has been shown to be effective and safe in patients with paroxysmal or sustained AF, the screening of patients with cryptogenic IS (CIS) for AF is paramount. Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is a subtype of CIS with a high likelihood of cardioembolism. The European Stroke Organization and European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend at least 72 h of screening when AF is suspected. The longer the screening and the earlier the time point after acute IS, the more likely the AF paroxysm is found. Several methods are available for short-term screening of AF, including in-hospital monitoring and wearable electrocardiogram recorders for home monitoring. Implantable loop monitors provide an effective long-term method to screen patients with high risk of AF after IS and artificial intelligence and convolutional neural networks may enhance the efficacy of AF screening in the future. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists in both primary and secondary prevention of IS in AF patients. Recent data from the randomized controlled trials (RCT) also suggest that early initiation of DOAC treatment after acute IS is safe compared to later initiation. Anticoagulation treatment may still predispose for intracranial bleeding, particularly among patients with prior cerebrovascular events. Left atrial appendix closure offers an optional treatment choice for patients with prior intracranial hemorrhage and may offer an alternative to oral anticoagulation even for patients with IS, but these indications await validation in ongoing RCTs. There are still controversies related to the association of found AF paroxysms in CIS patients with prolonged screening, pertaining to the optimal duration of screening and screening strategies with prolonged monitoring techniques in patients with ESUS. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of epidemiology, screening, and prognosis in AF patients with stroke.

Effects of sufficient anticoagulation on ischemic stroke outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Background: Optimal anticoagulation therapy reduces the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of prior anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on ischemic stroke outcomes in patients with nonvalvular AF.Methods: We enrolled 487 patients with ischemic stroke and nonvalvular AF between January 2013 and August 2020. The infarct volume was semi-automatically evaluated using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were categorized into no anticoagulation, undertreated anticoagulation, and sufficient anticoagulation (with VKA or DOAC) groups based on their pre-admission anticoagulant use, and the clinical characteristics were compared between the groups.Results: Among the included patients, 374 (76.8%), 50 (10.3%), 10 (2.1%), and 53 (10.9%) patients received no anticoagulants, were undertreated with a VKA, were sufficiently treated with a VKA, and received DOACs, respectively, before stroke. Multivariate analysis revealed that optimal anticoagulation was independently associated with a low risk of severe stroke (odds ratio, 0.553; 95% confidence interval, 0.308–0.992; P=0.047). Additionally, the DOAC group had a significantly smaller mean infarct volume than the other groups (45.8±73.2, 45.0±69.1, 30.9±24.7, and 12.6±24.9 mL in the no anticoagulation, insufficient VKA, sufficient VKA, and DOAC groups, respectively; P=0.011).Conclusion: Sufficient pre-stroke anticoagulation is associated with mild stroke severity and good outcomes at 3 months post-stroke. Additionally, pre-stroke DOAC treatment is associated with smaller infarct volume in patients with ischemic stroke and nonvalvular AF.

Risk scores for major bleeding from direct oral anticoagulants: comparing predictive performance in patients with atrial fibrillation

BackgroundDespite direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being safer than warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), major bleeding concerns persist. Most bleeding risk scores predate DOAC approval. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the Age, history of Bleeding, and non-bleeding related Hospitalisation [ABH] score’s performance—derived for DOAC-treated patients—with those of 5 other scores (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation [ATRIA], Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly [>65 years], Drugs/alcohol concomitantly [HAS-BLED], Hepatic, Hepatic or Renal Disease, Ethanol Abuse, Malignancy, Older Age, Reduced Platelet Count or Function, Re-Bleeding, Hypertension, Anemia, Genetic Factors, Excessive Fall Risk and Stroke [HEMORR2HAGES], Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [ORBIT-AF], and Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 [doubled], Diabetes, Stroke [doubled]-Vascular disease, Age 65–74, Sex category [CHA2DS2-VASc]) in predicting DOAC-related major bleeding in patients with AF. MethodsIn this retrospective study of 2364 patients with nonvalvular AF on rivaroxaban or apixaban (median age, 68.3 years; 32.1% women), International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis–defined major bleeding (incidence, 4.1%; n = 97) was analyzed. C-statistics from time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous risk scores were the primary comparison metric, but other metrics, such as decision curves, were also compared. ResultsAt 100 days, C-statistics were highest for ORBIT-AF and ATRIA (0.62 and 0.61, respectively, with other scores having an area under the ROC curve of <0.60); some significant differences favored ORBIT-AF. At 1100 days, C-statistics remained highest for ORBIT-AF and ATRIA (0.62 and 0.61, respectively, with other scores having an area under the ROC curve of <0.60 again), and ORBIT-AF had significantly higher C-statistics than those for all other risk scores (P < .05), except for ATRIA. At 2100 days, all C-statistics were <0.60 with no significant differences. Decision curves showed the greatest net benefit for ORBIT-AF and ATRIA at 100 days and for ATRIA at 1100 days, with no discernible net benefit for any of the scores at 2100 days. ConclusionORBIT-AF and ATRIA provided the best bleeding risk prediction within the first 1100 days. None of the 6 bleeding risk scores provided predictive benefit over 2100 days of DOAC treatment.

Construction of a risk scoring system using clinical factors and RYR2 polymorphisms for bleeding complications in patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

Introduction: Bleeding is one of the most undesirable complications of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). While the ryanodine receptor (RYR2) has been related to cardiac diseases, research on bleeding complications is lacking. This study aimed to elucidate the association between RYR2 and bleeding risk to develop the risk scoring system in patients treated with DOACs. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples. We selected ten SNPs within the RYR2 gene, and two models were constructed (Model I: demographic factors only, Model II: demographic and genetic factors) in multivariable analysis. Independent risk factors for bleeding were used to develop a risk scoring system. Results: A total of 447 patients were included, and 49 experienced either major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. In Model I, patients using rivaroxaban and experiencing anemia exhibited an increased bleeding risk after adjusting for covariates. Upon incorporating genetic factors into Model I, a significant association with bleeding was also observed in cases of overdosing on DOACs and in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30mL/min, in addition to rivaroxaban and anemia (Model II). Among genetic factors, RYR2 rs12594 GG, rs17682073 AA, rs3766871 GG, and rs6678625 T alleles were associated with bleeding complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of Model I was 0.670, whereas that of Model II increased to 0.803, demonstrating better performance with the inclusion of genetic factors. Using the significant variables in Model II, a risk scoring system was constructed. The predicted bleeding risks for scores of 0, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-10 points were 0%, 1.2%, 4.6%, 15.7%, 41.7%, and 73.3%, respectively. Conclusion: This study revealed an association between RYR2 and bleeding complications among patients taking DOACs and established a risk scoring system to support individualized DOAC treatment for these patients.

The effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulant therapy on stroke severity and functional prognosis for very elderly cardioembolic stroke patients at high bleeding risk

Abstract Background The All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry showed that taking any DOACs was associated with reduced stroke/systemic embolisms and was not associated with increased major bleeding in very elderly (≥80 years) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high bleeding risk (1). However, the relationship between very elderly (≥80 years) cardioembolic stroke (CES) patients with NVAF at high bleeding risk and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy before stroke onset remains unknown. Methods During a 10-year period from April 2011 to March 2021, 364 CES patients (≥80 years) with NVAF admitted to our hospital within 48 hours after stroke onset and with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 before onset were studied. High bleeding risk was defined as having any following factors; a bleeding history, renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance &amp;lt;30 ml/min), low body weight (≤45 kg), use of antiplatelet or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. They were divided into two groups: high bleeding risk group (H group) (n=214; median 85 years [82-88]; 144 women [67%]) and non-high bleeding risk group (Non-H group) (n=150; median 84 years [82-87]; 69 women [46%]). We compared stroke severity between the two groups and evaluated effect of DOAC treatment on stroke severity and functional outcome. Results CHADS₂ score was significantly higher in the H group than in the Non-H group (median 4 [3-4] versus 3 [2-4], p=0.002). NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score on admission and proportion of mortality (mRS:6) were relatively higher in H group than in Non-H group, but there were no significant differences among the two groups. However, mRS score at discharge was worse in the H group than in the Non-H group (median 4 [2-5] versus 3 [1-4], p=0.002). The patients in the H group were further divided into three groups based on the treatment with OAC before stroke onset: DOAC therapy (n=20), no-OAC (n=148) and warfarin therapy (n=46). The number of patients with NIHSS (≥8) on admission and mRS (≥5) at discharge were 8 (40%), 104 (70%), and 30 (65%) (p=0.03) and 3 (15%), 60 (41%) and 23 (50%) (p=0.03), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that DOAC therapy had a lower odds ratio (OR) for severe stroke (NIHSS ≥8) on admission (OR to no-OAC=0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.08-0.62; p=0.005) and poor functional outcome (mRS ≥5) at discharge (OR=0.20; 95% CI=0.05-0.80; p=0.02), when no-OAC was used as a reference after adjusting for confounders. Conclusion Very elderly (≥80 years) CES patients with NVAF at high bleeding risk have severe CES than those at non-high bleeding risk. However, DOAC therapy before stroke onset may be associated with reduced stroke severity on admission and poor functional outcome at discharge in very elderly (≥80 years) CES patients with NVAF at high bleeding risk.

Abstract 17671: Comparative Analysis of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT). Warfarin has been shown to be an effective treatment in mitigating thrombotic events; however, numerous limitations exist, including the need for frequent monitoring and increased risk of side effects. Despite this, insight into DOAC use for the treatment of LVT remains limited. Thus, this study seeks to investigate the safety and efficacy of DOACs as a potential alternative to warfarin for the treatment of LVT. Hypothesis: DOACs decreases the risk of adverse events compared to Warfarin in patients with LVT. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a federated realtime database called TriNetX which is comprised of over 100 million patient records. ICD-10 diagnostic codes and national drug codes were used to stratify adults by warfarin or DOAC treatment within 3 months of an initial LVT diagnosis. A 1:1 matched propensity score analysis was conducted, adjusting for comorbidities and demographics, to calculate adjusted Risk Ratios (aRR) with 95% CI. 90-day risk for mortality, stroke, need for blood transfusion, hemorrhage, and arterial embolism &amp; thrombosis were examined. Results: In a matched sample of 11,206 patients in each cohort, patients with LVT who took warfarin within 3 months of initial diagnosis is at higher risk for stroke (aRR[95%CI]=1.44(1.34,1.55)], need for blood transfusion [1.29(1.11,1.51)], hemorrhage [1.56(1.35,1.8)], and arterial thromboembolism [1.28(1.13,1.45)] than LVT patients who took a DOAC. Risk for death was non-significant between cohorts. Conclusions: The findings from this large electronic medical record patient cohort establish higher rates of adverse events for patients with LVT treated with warfarin versus DOAC, with no statistically significant difference in therapeutic efficacy.

Benefits and Harms of Standard Versus Reduced-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for Older Adults With Multiple Morbidities and Atrial Fibrillation.

Background Dose reduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications is inconsistently applied to older adults with multiple morbidities, potentially due to perceived harms and unknown benefits of standard dosing. Methods and Results Using 2013 to 2017 US Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set records, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. We identified DOAC initiators (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) aged ≥65 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation residing in a nursing home. We estimated inverse-probability of treatment weights for DOAC dose using propensity scores. We examined safety (hospitalization for major bleeding) and effectiveness outcomes (all-cause mortality, thrombosis [myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism]). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs using cause-specific hazard-regression models. Of 21 878 DOAC initiators, 48% received reduced dosing. The mean age of residents was 82.0 years, 66% were female, and 31% had moderate/severe cognitive impairment. After estimating inverse-probability of treatment weights, standard dosing was associated with a higher rate of bleeding (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.37]; 9.4 versus 8.0 events per 100 person-years). Standard-dose therapy was associated with the highest rates of bleeding among those aged >80 years (9.1 versus 6.7 events per 100 person-years) and with a body mass index <30 kg/m2 (9.4 versus 7.4 events per 100 person-years). There was no association of dosing with mortality (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.96-1.06]) or thrombotic events (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.96-1.41]). Conclusions In this nationwide study of nursing home residents with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, we found a higher rate of bleeding and little difference in effectiveness of standard versus reduced-dose DOAC treatment. Our results support the use of reduced-dose DOACs for many older adults with multiple morbidities.

Trajectories of adherence to extended treatment with direct oral anticoagulants and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about medication adherence patterns and their association with effectiveness and safety among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy beyond 3-6 months of initial treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between adherence trajectories of extended treatment with DOAC and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding among patients with VTE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with incident VTE who completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and received either DOAC extended therapy or no extended therapy using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2013-2019). We used group-based trajectory models to identify distinct adherence patterns during extended treatment. Using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the association between the adherence trajectories and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 10,960 patients with extended treatment with DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) and 5,133 patients with no extended treatment, we identified 4 distinct trajectories (consistently high, gradually declining, rapidly declining, and no extended treatment). Compared with the no extended treatment group, the groups with consistently high adherence (hazard ratio = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17) and with gradually declining adherence (0.13, 0.03-0.53) showed decreased recurrent VTE risk without increased major bleeding risk (consistently high adherence 1.19, 0.71-1.99; gradually declining adherence 1.96, 0.81-4.70). There was no difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (0.34, 0.10-1.16) for the group with rapidly declining adherence, but this group was associated with increased major bleeding risk (2.65, 1.01-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the clinical importance of continuing and remaining adherent to extended DOAC treatment without increased major bleeding risk for patients with VTE. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program. The funding source had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the article for publication. Dr Lo-Ciganic reported receiving research funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Dr Dietrich reported receiving honorarium for training and education from BMS/Pfizer. Dr DeRemer is a stockholder of Portola Pharmaceuticals and reported receiving personal fees for advisory board meeting from BMS. No other disclosures were reported.

OC 74.4 Prevalence and Predictors of Non-Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, a Historical Cohort Study

OC 74.4 Prevalence and Predictors of Non-Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, a Historical Cohort Study